Strategic Communications and Marketing News Bureau

TSA’s new airport security measures aim to target most suspicious passengers

On April 2, the Transportation Security Administration announced new airport security measures to vet passengers based on specific intelligence information, replacing the current system that indiscriminately singles out travelers from 14 “terrorism-prone” countries for mandatory screening. The new measures would be based on information gathered about passengers’ travel patterns, names and passport numbers. Sheldon H. Jacobson, a U. of I. computer science professor and expert on aviation security, was interviewed by News Bureau news editor Phil Ciciora about the changes to airport security screening procedures.

Will this new intelligence-based system of information profiling be more effective than the current system?

This is a step in the right direction for the TSA, but it does not go far enough. Using intelligence information to target passengers who are riskier based on the information they provide or based on their behavior prior to boarding will improve the use of our finite security resources, but the next natural step is to use such information for domestic passengers and flights, and revamp the entire aviation security system to utilize the most effective security resources on the right passengers.

If the current system had been in place last Christmas, would it have caught the would-be terrorist before he even got on the plane?

The easy answer is yes. But the bigger question is whether the information on the Dec. 25 terrorist fits with the intelligence that would have flagged a more detailed search. Evidence suggests that it would have.

Would full-body scanners help to provide an extra layer of security? Given that the concerns over privacy issues has ebbed, would they be an effective screening tool given the TSA’s new procedures?

Yes, provided it’s targeted at the right passengers and not indiscriminately at all passengers. The most robust strategy is to use high-level security resources, like full-body scanners, on passengers for whom the least information is known, or intelligence suggests a possible risk. Security, not privacy, is the most troubling issue with the indiscriminate use of full-body scanners.

If a passenger either has a questionable risk profile, or their information is unknown or missing, then subject them to the most aggressive screening procedures, including full-body-scanner screening. But screening all passengers with the highest level of security resources is like taking a sip of water from a fire hose rather than a water fountain.

In essence, what we need is a reallocation of security resources and a refinement in how they are used, not a simple deployment of more of them. Only the appropriate use of such a technology will provide the TSA with a fighting chance to protect the airspace and work toward eliminating the occurrence of events like the one last Christmas.

Since 9/11, we have spent billions of dollars to improve aviation security. Since then, every time a near-miss has occurred, we reactively rush to fill the apparent security void. If full-body scanners are such an important tactic in securing our air system, shouldn’t we just subject everyone to it?

The TSA’s strategy to stop terrorist tactics has hidden the real need to stop the terrorists themselves. Explosives don’t destroy airplanes, malicious people destroy airplanes. It is time that we stop wasting money on aggressively screening and inconveniencing the wrong people, and focus fewer security resources on the people who are least likely to be a threat, so that more security resources can be used to target everyone else, including those who are more likely to be a threat, or for whom information is unclear about their threat status.

If all passengers are required to be screened using a full-body scanner, then our system will indeed be less secure, not more secure, by diverting valuable and limited resources away from the actual terrorists. Although this may seem counterintuitive – less screening resulting in more security – the resulting policy would lead to more security resources targeted toward the people who may pose the greatest potential threat.

Full-body scanners will also require image interpretation by people, in the same way that explosive-detection system and X-ray machine images must be interpreted. Therefore, they are certain to be fraught with the same human errors that result in threat items getting past security screening checkpoints today. The reduced throughput rate for such devices will also increase the opportunity for human error, and the indiscriminate use of full-body scanners will only serve to create a false sense of security and effectively make our air system less secure.

Information is the greatest tool we have to protect our air system. Cutting-edge technologies are only as effective as the information that supports their use. Of course, the best way to protect our air system is to remove the need and incentive for others to afflict harm on it, which goes far beyond the capabilities of any technology.

Read Next

Health and medicine Life sciences Veterinary medicine Two men in a lab. The seated man holds a hologram projection of a brain.

Mutation increases enzyme in mouse brains linked to schizophrenia behaviors

Researchers found a key role for an enzyme regulating glycine in the brain while investigating a rare genetic mutation found in two patients with schizophrenia.

Honors A photo collage featuring all three Sloan Fellowship awardees.

Three Illinois professors named Sloan Research Fellows

Three Illinois scientists are among 126 recipients of the 2025 Sloan Research Fellowships from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. According to the foundation, the awardees represent “the very best of early-career science, embodying the creativity, ambition, and rigor that drive discovery forward.” This year’s Illinois recipients are chemistry professors Angad Mehta and Lisa Olshansky, and materials science and engineering professor Yingjie Zhang.

Life sciences Graphic with the title "42nd Insect Fear Film Festival" in a scary font and with a picture of a tarantula.

Insect Fear Film Festival to feature ‘hairy, scary’ tarantulas

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. — The 2025 Insect Fear Film Festival at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign will feature “Tarantulas: Hairy, Scary Spiders” as its theme and a Hollywood bug wrangler who works with the 8-legged creatures as a special guest. The festival, which is hosted by the Entomology Graduate Student Association and is in its 42nd […]

Strategic Communications and Marketing News Bureau

507 E. Green St
MC-426
Champaign, IL 61820

Email: stratcom@illinois.edu

Phone (217) 333-5010