Strategic Communications and Marketing News Bureau

Does hunting with lead ammunition endanger human, environmental health?

Editor’s note: A recent study from Wesleyan University found that 48% of ground meat samples made from white-tailed deer killed with lead shotgun slugs in Illinois were contaminated with lead, while meat from deer killed by archers contained no lead. Illinois Natural History Survey human dimensions scientist Craig Miller spoke to News Bureau life sciences editor Diana Yates about the risks associated with using lead ammunition in hunting.

What are the dangers of lead-contaminated meat for human health?

Lead ammunition poses a danger to human health through consumption of contaminated meat. It’s important to understand the properties of the ammunition in question. Lead bullets fired from high-powered rifles fragment into shards when they strike bone in deer. These fragments scatter throughout the muscle and other soft tissues in the body. When the meat is processed for consumption, these fragments remain. Studies have found that lead fragments show up in X-rays of the meat.

High-powered rifles are not legal for deer hunting in Illinois. Instead, those who hunt with firearms use lead slugs fired from either rifled shotguns or muzzleloaders, which are much larger and slower than bullets from high-powered rifles. Instead of fragmenting like bullets, they transform into a mushroom shape on impact. Lead can still contaminate the meat, but it is mostly found in the vicinity of the wound.

 

Two white-tailed deer stand together in the woods.

Studies have shown that meat harvested from deer killed with lead ammunition can be contaminated with lead particles, endangering human health and harming wildlife.

Lead is a toxic metal that should never be consumed. It causes neurological damage in the brain and spinal cord, and harms kidneys and other organs. Lead is found naturally in some soils, and root vegetables and some fruit juices may contain traceable levels of lead at extremely low concentration. Lead fragments in meat should be avoided completely.

Does lead ammunition endanger other animals?

There are two pathways by which lead endangers wildlife: by ingestion of lead-contaminated prey or by picking up lead fragments from ammunition that enters the environment.

Scavengers, including eagles and California condors, sometimes feed on the entrails of deer and other big game after they are harvested by hunters. Researchers began to publicize this issue in the early 2000s. Mourning doves have been found to ingest very small shot left behind when hunters fire at doves in the field. These lead pellets are about the size of ragweed seeds, a favorite food of doves. Dove populations are declining in parts of their range, and some researchers think lead shot ingestion plays a role in this decline. Other pathways for consumption were through birds such as eagles eating wounded waterfowl. This problem was addressed by banning lead for waterfowl hunting.

In the 1970s, INHS researchers showed that waterfowl were consuming lead shot. The small round BBs were about the same size as seeds the ducks normally eat. The shot would be ground up in the birds’ gizzards and enter their bloodstream.

After the publication of these studies, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service banned the use of lead shot for hunting waterfowl nationwide by 1992. Nontoxic shot alternatives are now required by law for waterfowl hunting throughout North America. The European Union this year banned all lead ammunition in its member nations.

Why did it take so long to recognize the dangers from lead ammunition?

People have been consuming meat from wild game animals killed with lead ammunition since the invention of firearms in the early 15th century. While the dangers of lead have been known for more than a century, the threat of lead from hunting has only recently been recognized. Thanks in large part to innovative research conducted on the subject, public awareness of the dangers of lead in the environment has been increasing for the last half-century.

What alternatives exist that would allow hunters to harvest deer without endangering their own health and the environment?

Hunters should be aware of the potential dangers resulting from the use of lead shotgun slugs and lead sabots in muzzleloading rifles. Nonlead alternatives, such as copper, are increasingly available, and hunters are voluntarily transitioning to copper for single-projectile ammunition.

Hunters also need to recognize problems associated with using lead shot for hunting pheasants, rabbits, doves and other species. 

Several states are now requiring nonlead shot be used on public lands. In harvesting deer to control the spread of chronic wasting disease, the Illinois Department of Natural Resources now uses copper ammunition.

Movement is underway to limit or ban all lead ammunition in the U.S. and Canada, as has recently occurred in Europe. Given increased awareness and justifiable concern over lead in our bodies and environment, hunters are now questioning the use of lead.

 

Editor’s note:  To contact Craig Miller, email craigm@illinois.edu.

Read Next

Announcements Marcelo Garcia, professor of civil and environmental engineering at The Grainger College of Engineering.

Illinois faculty member elected to National Academy of Engineering

Champaign, Ill. — Marcelo Garcia, a professor of civil and environmental engineering in The Grainger College of Engineering, has been elected to the National Academy of Engineering.

Social sciences Male and female student embracing on the quad with flowering redbud tree and the ACES library in the background. Photo by Michelle Hassel

Dating is not broken, but the trajectories of relationships have changed

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. — According to some popular culture writers and online posts by discouraged singles lamenting their inability to find romantic partners, dating is “broken,” fractured by the social isolation created by technology, pandemic lockdowns and potential partners’ unrealistic expectations. Yet two studies of college students conducted a decade apart found that their ideas about […]

Engineering Civil and Environmental Engineering Professor Nishant Garg, center, is joined by fellow researchers, from left: Yujia Min, Hossein Kabir, Nishant Garg, center, Chirayu Kothari and M. Farjad Iqbal, front right. In front are examples of clay samples dissolved at different concentrations in a NaOH solution. The team invented a new test that can predict the performance of cementitious materials in mere 5 minutes. This is in contrast to the standard ASTM tests, which take up to 28 days. This new advance enables real-time quality control at production plants of emerging, sustainable materials. Photo taken at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign on Monday, Feb. 3, 2025. (Photo by Fred Zwicky / University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign)

Researchers develop a five-minute quality test for sustainable cement industry materials

A new test developed at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign can predict the performance of a new type of cementitious construction material in five minutes — a significant improvement over the current industry standard method, which takes seven or more days to complete. This development is poised to advance the use of next-generation resources called supplementary cementitious materials — or SCMs — by speeding up the quality-check process before leaving the production floor.

Strategic Communications and Marketing News Bureau

507 E. Green St
MC-426
Champaign, IL 61820

Email: stratcom@illinois.edu

Phone (217) 333-5010